In Criminal Application No. 113 of 2013, the court disposed of the applicant's application regarding trial expeditiousness by referring to a prior order directing trial completion within four months, finding no further direction necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-appln113.13.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 113 OF 2013
Anil Bhanudas Waghmode
....Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent.
Ms. Farhana Shah Associated advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 10 JULY 2013
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Pednekar, the learned APP. He states that the
accused No.8 has applied this Court for discharge and accused No.11 to the learned Special Judge under the MCOC Act and Accused No. 9 has applied for bail before this Court.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Accused-Applicant is concerned, according to her the matter is not taken up for unavailability of the learned Judge. On 8 April 2013, in Criminal Bail Application No. 1212 of 2012 (Paulson Joseph Palitra Vs. The
1/2
ssm 2 20-appln113.13.sxw State of Maharashtra) this Court, (Coram- Abhay M. Thipsay, J.) directed the expeditious trial and liberty to the said Applicant to apply, if the trial is not concluded within four months. Considering this scenario of the matter, I do not see any further direction to be issued for expediting the trial, Application is disposed of.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
2/2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Paulson Joseph Palitra Vs. The State of MaharashtraReferred¶16
Criminal Bail Application No. 1212 of 2012 (Paulson Joseph Palitra Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Anil Bhanudas Waghmode
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
