The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed a criminal application at an interim stage, refusing interference as the applicant was permitted to approach the trial judge for discharge.
The Criminal Application was dismissed with liberty to apply to the trial judge for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1002 OF 2012
Balu s/o Somnath Fulare ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT
Shri G.N. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant Shri S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED: 21st September, 2013.
PER COURT :
fmp/cri1002.12
Balu s/o Somnath Fulare
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. Chandiwala
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
