The Court dismissed the criminal appeal challenging an acquittal recorded by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge. The appeal was rejected as the medical evidence did not implicate the respondent, the theory of injury was futile, and no cruelty under Section 498A IPC emerged.
Criminal Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
929 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2013
PRATIBHA VISHWESHWAR LAWANDE VERSUS
VISHWESHWAR BHIMRAJ LAWANDE AND ORS
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Tambe Rahul A.
Mr. BV Wagh, APP for Respondent/State
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Dated: September 20, 2013
PER COURT :-
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. )
bdv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the acquittal in the Sessions Case questioning medical evidence does not call for interference.
Pratibha Vishweshwar Lawande
Vishweshwar Bhimrajs Lawande
K. U. Chandiwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
