Application seeking suspension of sentence and bail was permitted to be withdrawn by the High Court before the disposition of the substantive question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
3-appa-615-13
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2012
Sanjay Tarasingh Thakur .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. D. G. Khamkar, appointed Advocate for applicant. Mr. H. J Dedhia, APP for State.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
AUGUST 01, 2013.
P.C.
After arguing for some time, when the court expressed its disinclination to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment and release the applicant on bail, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.
Though we were inclined to dismiss this application, this application is permitted to be withdrawn and is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
Sanjay Tarasingh Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
P. V. Hardas
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
