In this criminal appeal concerning condonation of delay, the High Court of Bombay held that sufficient cause existed to condone the delay in filing the appeal against conviction. The application was allowed on merits.
Delay in filing criminal appeal is condoned; appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 1.cri.appa.1151.13.sxw
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1151 OF 2013 IN
CRI. APPEAL (ST.) NO. 862 OF 2013
Mrs. Pratima Jaykishan Chaurasiya Vs. The State of Maharashtra
.. Applicant
..Respondent
Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar i/b K.M. Tripathi Advocate for Applicant Mrs. V.R. Bhonsale, A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2013
P.C.:
1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the Criminal Appeal against conviction. In our view, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal, hence, delay is condoned.
3 Application is disposed of.
[MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
kandarkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause to condone delay in filing criminal appeal was made out.
Mrs. Pratima Jaykishan Chaurasiya
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhaskar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
