The High Court of Bombay disposed of an appeal and a connected notice of motion since the parties arrived at consent minutes settling the dispute. No substantive legal principle is discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPL202-26.6
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODG.) NO.202 OF 2013 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2427 OF 2012 IN SUIT NO.2477 OF 2012
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODG.) NO.912 OF 2013
Janak Bapulal Shah and another ..Appellants. versus
Rachana Shirish Shah and others
..Respondents.
Mr. Nagendra Dube i/b Lex Conveniens for the Appellants. Mr. Sanjay Jain i/b Ashok Purohit & Co. for Respondents 1 to 3. Ms. Armin Wandrewala i/b Mr. Prashant Kulkarni for Respondents 5 and 6. Ms. Kainaz Irani i/b Zohair & Co. for Respondents 7 to 9.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
26 June 2013.
P.C. :
All the parties to the Appeal have arrived at Consent Minutes of Orders which have been taken on record. Since the dispute has been settled, there shall be an order in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order. The Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
In view of the disposal of the Appeal, Notice of Motion (Lodg.) 912 of 2013 does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Janak Bapulal Shah
Rachana Shirish Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
