The High Court of Bombay dismissed an appeal against an ad-interim order granting injunction in a specific performance suit. The modest order disposed of the appeal and the related notice of motion without granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 APP.31.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.31 OF 2013 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2289 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.1887 OF 2011
Surendra Narvekar Appellant versus M/s.Kukreja Construction Company Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr.Chirag Modi i/by M/s.RMG Law Associates for Respondent no.1.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
DATE : 23 July 2013
PC :
2 of 2 APP.31.2013
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
(S.C.GUPTE, J.)
MST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against an ad-interim order granting injunction in a suit for specific performance should be allowed.
Surendra Narvekar
M/s.Kukreja Construction Company
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
S.C.GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
