The High Court allowed a criminal application seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 420 IPC. Finding that the dispute between the applicant and the informant was amicably settled, the court quashed the FIR.]}
Quashed and set aside the First Information Report lodged by respondent no.2 qua the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
13-apl.681.2013.doc
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.681 OF 2013
Chinnaiah E.V. Gowda
...Applicant.
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents.
Mr.S.V. Marwadi i/b.Mr. Ravi S. Kotian, for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. Ms.Mamata Sharma, for respondent no.2. P.I Sachin Sandbhor, Tilak Nagar Police Station.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
AUGUST 16, 2013.
P.C.
of Criminal Procedure, the applicant who is an accused in Crime No.209 of 2012 registered on the basis of the First Information Report lodged by the respondent no.2 seeks quashing of the same.
2
13-apl.681.2013.doc
3
13-apl.681.2013.doc
above.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report regarding cheating should be quashed after the dispute has been amicably settled between the applicant and the first informant.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chinnaiah E.V. Gowda
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
P. V. Hardas
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
