In Criminal Appeal No. 315 of 2003, the court held that since the respondent accused had died, the appeal abated and was accordingly dismissed without disposing the matter on merits.
The criminal appeal abated due to the death of the respondent and is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apeal-315-03
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2003
State of Maharashtra .. Appellant Vs. Dhanpal Babgonda Patil .. Respondent
Ms. V. S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P. for Appellant.
Mr. Sagar Mane i/b. Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : AUGUST 20, 2013.
P.C. :
A report is received that original respondent expired
on 11th November, 2007. Death certificate is annexed including
copy of order dated 22nd November, 2011 in civil Writ Petition No. 8683 of 2004. Considering the death of respondent –
accused, nothing survive Appeal abates and dismissed.
(K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1/1
State of Maharashtra
Dhanpal Babgonda Patil
K. U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
