High Court condoned a delay of 106 days in filing a review application under Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No. 86 of 2013 regarding Sessions Case No. 26/2010 and allowed the principal Criminal Application No. 73 of 2013.
The delay of 106 days was condoned and the Criminal Application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appr73.13
krs
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2013
In
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.86 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Ms V.S.Mhaispurkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the applicant.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE : AUGUST 19, 2013.
P.C.:
Heard.
Delay of 106 days caused for making an
application to review the order passed below Exh.35 in Sessions Case no.26/2010. Delay is sufficiently explained and hence, condoned.
Criminal Application no.73 of 2013 is allowed.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 106 days in filing application for review of impugned order should be condoned.
State
K.U. Chandiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
