In an anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that without a direct forensic report implicating the accused, the alleged negligence in the FIR cannot be presumed. The court made the interim order absolute.
The ad-interim order granting anticipatory bail dated 3rd September, 2013 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S
aba937.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2013
Ravindra Eknath Kumawat .. Applicant. Vs.
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Dhananjay B. Thoke i/b Ajay S. Patil for the applicant. Mr. V. B. Konde Deshmukh APP for the respondent.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2013.
1/3
aba937.13
2/3
aba937.13
officer based on forensic report and analysis or otherwise.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a case for continuing protection granted by the court granting anticipatory bail.
Whether negligence as alleged in the FIR can be presumed at this stage without a forensic report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra Eknath Kumawat
State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
