The Bombay High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application, holding that the applicant's past history of quarrels and assaults on the deceased, combined with lack of alibi evidence prior to charge sheet filing, negated the claim of false implication.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed. Ad interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba 884-13
smt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 884 OF 2013
Raghuveer Singh .. Applicant.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents.
Shri A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Kokila Kalra i/by Shri Vijay Hiremath, for the Applicant.
Shri V.B. Konde Deshmukh, APP for the Respondents.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2013.
The applicant is victim of prejudices. The implication of accused is based on suspicion than on evidence. He has co-operated with the investigating agency and was interrogated on 17 occasions.
1/2
aba 884-13
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, given the circumstances of past alleged misconduct and lack of alibi support before charge sheet, is entitled to anticipatory bail.
Raghuveer Singh
State of Maharashtra
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
