Bombay High Court dismissed CBA Nos. 72 and 73 of 2013 after the State filed a charge sheet, holding that arrest would only occur after process issuance, making the applications unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABA-72-73-13
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2013
Suryakant Ramkrushna Patil .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2013
Minakshi Suryakant Patil & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondent
Ms Rashmi Gagwani for Applicants. Mr. J. P. Kharge - APP for State.
Mr. S. R. Nargolkar i/b. Mr. Parag Shelke for Respondent No. 2 / Intervener.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2013.
2] Considering that the charge sheet is filed, the eventuality of arrest of applicants would accrue only after the court issues process.
1/2
ABA-72-73-13
skc
before the court and apply for regular bail.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
Suryakant Ramkrushna Patil
Minakshi Suryakant Patil
The State of Maharashtra
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
