The High Court of Bombay disposed of two criminal anticipatory bail applications without deciding on merits after the charge sheet was filed and the Court indicated applicants could surrender and apply for regular bail.
Applications disposed of without deciding on merits; applicants directed to surrender if required for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABA-72-73-13
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2013
Suryakant Ramkrushna Patil .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2013
Minakshi Suryakant Patil & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondent
Ms Rashmi Gagwani for Applicants. Mr. J. P. Kharge - APP for State.
Mr. S. R. Nargolkar i/b. Mr. Parag Shelke for Respondent No. 2 / Intervener.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2013.
2] Considering that the charge sheet is filed, the eventuality of arrest of applicants would accrue only after the court issues process.
1/2
ABA-72-73-13
skc
before the court and apply for regular bail.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
Suryakant Ramkrushna Patil
Minakshi Suryakant Patil & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
