The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition upon furnishing concrete material.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach again with concrete material.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.958 OF 2012 "Vijay Asaram Gunjal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others."
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. R.U. Bhutekar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, GP for respondents.
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 3rdt FEBRYARY , 2012.
PER COURT :-
1] Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach again, with some concrete material.
[SUNIL .P. DESHMUKH,J.]
[B.R. GAVAI, J.]
grt/-
Vijay Asaram Gunjal
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
