This court rejected a petition challenging the shifting of a school to the same premises, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi as neither a student nor staff and that no prejudice was caused.
Petition rejected on ground of no locus standi and lack of prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.919 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
and the Registrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Coram: B.R.Gavai and
Sunil P.Deshmukh, JJ
Date : 3rd February, 2012
Shri P.S. Shinde, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
Shri U.B.Bondar, Advocate for Resp.Nos.3 & 4.
The petitioner has no locus. She is neither
a student nor she is working in the school,
inasmuch as the school is being shifted in the
same premises. There is no prejudice caused to
the petitioner.
2.The petition does not warrant invocation of
extra-ordinary jurisdiction.
Petition, as such, is rejected.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.)
pnd/wp-919.12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to challenge the shifting of the school premises.
Whether the matter warrants invocation of the High Court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
Petitioner
Respondent-State
Resp.Nos.3 & 4
B.R.Gavai
Sunil P.Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court