The petitioner sought a direction for the grant of a validity certificate within a stipulated period. The court granted liberty to submit a fresh proposal to respondent no.3, which must be decided within six months.
Liberty to submit a fresh proposal to respondent no.3 to be decided within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
WRIT PETITION NO. 950 OF 2012
SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH GULAM VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shinde Ajay AGP for Respondents: Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi.
CORAM : B R GAVAI & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: February 02, 2012
PER COURT :-
( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( B R GAVAI, J. )
aaa/-
SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH GULAM
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
B R GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
