Writ petition disposed via signed consent terms between petitioners and respondent No.6; State not bound. Rule discharged.
Order in terms of consent terms between petitioners and respondent No.6. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KPP -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 361 OF 2008
Padmashali Shikshana Sanstha and another
....Petitioners
vs.
The Administrative Officer and others ..Respondents
Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP, for the State. Mr. C.M. Lokesh for respondent No.6.
CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR &
R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATE: MARCH 02, 2012.
P.C.
Matter not on Board. Taken on Board at the request of the learned
counsel appearing for the parties.
P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
Padmashali Shikshana Sanstha
The Administrative Officer
P.B. MAJMUDAR
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
