Disposed
Razia Sultan Saifi v. Rajendra Tendulkar
Bombay HCWP/914/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JVS
WP.914.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 914 OF 2012
Razia Sultan Saifi :- Petitioner versus Rejendra Tendulkar :- Respondent
Through Jail. Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & P.D.KODE,JJ.
DATED:-3rd AUGUST, 2012
P.C.:-
Learned APP has invited our attention to the private complaint filed by the Petitioner, for the same cause referred to in the present Letter Petition. In the said private complaint, direction under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was issued by the concerned Court, whereafter, the investigation was done by the local police station and even charge-sheet has been filed.
Page 1 of 2
JVS
WP.914.2012.doc
(P.D.KODE,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)Page 2 of 2
Razia Sultan Saifi
Rejendra Tendulkar
A.M. Khanwilkar
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court