Criminal application sought to permit amendment of a writ petition. The court observed that the main writ petition had been disposed of by a separate judgment passed on the same day. Consequently, the amendment application was disposed of as nothing survived for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25208
vgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 252 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITON NO. 1017 OF 2005
Asiya Widow of Sayed Khwaja Ayub ...Applicant V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Mihir Desai for the Applicant
Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with P.A. Pol, P.P., for the State Mr. Girish Kulkarni for Respondent No. 3
Mr. Subhahs Jha with Ms. Sharon Patole i/by M/s. Law Global for Respondent Nos. 11 to 14
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: APRIL 10, 2012
P.C. :-
By this application, the applicant has prayed for permitting
to amend the Writ Petition as outlined in Exhibit 'B' to the application.
this application. The same is disposed of.
P.D. KODE, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Asiya Widow of Sayed Khwaja Ayub
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
