In a Writ Petition challenging the restoration of a respondent's licence, the Court declined to entertain the petition due to the existence of an alternate remedy. The Court noted disputed facts and did not decide the merits.
Writ Petition disposed of with liberty to avail alternate remedy; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 854.2012
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 854 OF 2012
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 25/01/2012.
Mr. H.P.Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K.Tambe, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State.
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 854.2012
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/W.P. 854.2012
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging the restoration of a licence should be entertained when an alternate remedy is available.
Whether the District Supply Officer violated court directions in restoring the licence.
Petitioner
State
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
