Writ petition challenging rejection of petitioner's representation due to alleged lack of thorough inquiry by the Director; High Court found no basis for interference.
No interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction warranted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7599.12.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7599 OF 2012
M/s.Shivshambho Kanhersidh Sarvajanik Mofat Vachanalaya ...Petitioner Versus The Director, Office of Director of Library & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Milind Deshmukh for Petitioner.
Ms.Molina P.Thakur, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 25, 2012.
P.C.
1/2
SQ Pathan
7599.12.doc
2
( SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
2/2
SQ Pathan
M/s. Shivshambho Kanhersidh Sarvajanik Mofat Vachanalaya
The Director, Office of Director of Library
AM KHANWILKAR
VK TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
