Rahimtulla Chhotelal v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution as the appellant was not contactable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.lpa.362.02.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2002 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2108 OF 2002
Rahimtulla Chhotelal
..Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. D.A.Nalawade for appellant Mr. A.I.Patel for Respondent No.1
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2012.
P.C.:
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. ]
kandarkar
Pg 1 of 1
Rahimtulla Chhotelal
State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court