Disposed
Manohar Maruti Bhandurge v. the State of Mahrashtra through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour
Bombay HCWP/742/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/2
WP741&742.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.741 OF 2012
Devkar Vijay Anantrao & Ors. ..... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents
ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.742 OF 2012
Manohar Maruti Bhandurge ..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents
Mr.Sushil Mahadeshwar, i/b. Ms.Ranjana Todankar for the Petitioners. Ms.Lata Desai, i/b. Ms.Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.B.Ketkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Pankaj Uttaradhi, i/b. Ms.Sabeena Mahadik for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATED : 11th DECEMBER, 2012
P.C. :
Heard counsel for the parties. It is common ground that the issues raised in these petition are answered in the decision dated 20th November, 2012 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Petition No. 1527/2011 in the case of Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Sangh & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of on the same terms as noted
kvm
2/2
WP741&742.12
in the said decision.
(R.D.DHANUKA, J)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Sangh & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.Referred¶19
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Sangh & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Devkar Vijay Anantrao & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.D. Dhankuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court