Petitioner complained of unauthorized construction. Court disposed of writ petition by directing parties to participate in proceedings under Section 55 of MRTP Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.745.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 745 OF 2012
Sunil Kumar Mehra :- Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. :- Respondents
Mr. Atul Damle with Ms. Bina Janwala, i/b. M/s. Auroma Law, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Naik, for Respondent No. 7.
Ms. K. R. Punjabi, for Respondent Corporation.
Mr. Kalpesh Patil, i/b Mr. Vijay Patil, for Respondent No. 6.
Mr. R. J. Mane, AGP, for Respondent No. 8.
CORAM :- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.D.DHANUKA,JJ.
DATED :- DECEMBER 10, 2012
P.C. :-
The grievance in this Petition is about unauthorised
construction put up by Respondent No. 7, obstructing the common
passage of the other occupants of the building.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
WP.745.2012.doc
(R.D.DHANUKA,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar Mehra
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.D. Dhenuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court