In a writ petition, the High Court directed respondent No. 2 to decide petitioners' representations within three months and fixed a date for their appearance before the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
aswp-7353-12
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7353 OF 2012
Babaji Balku Shirke and ors. .. Petitioners
Vs.
The Collector and Deputy Director For Rehabilitation, Kolhapur and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. P. D. Dalvi for petitioners. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP for respondents-State.
CORAM: S. A. BOBDE &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
AUGUST 10, 2012.
P.C.
appropriate to direct the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioners' representations within a period of three months from the date the
2
aswp-7353-12
petitioners appear before the respondents. The petitioners are directed to
appear before the respondent no.2 on 28.8.2012.
3. Rule is disposed of accordingly.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (S. A. BOBDE,J.)
Babaji Balku Shirke and ors.
The Collector and Deputy Director For Rehabilitation, Kolhapur and ors.
S. A. Bobde
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
