Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, citing lack of interest in pursuing the remedy.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mlns
1
WP/71012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 710 OF 2012
Vitthal Corporation Ltd. ...Petitioner
Vs
Union of India & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.M.A.Utagikar, advocate, for petitioner.
Mr.Vishwajeet Sawant, advocate, a/w
Mr.R.A.Lokhande, advocate, for respondent no.1 & 2.
CORAM :A.M.KHANWILKAR AND
N.M. JAMDAR JJ.
DATED :2nd MARCH, 2012.
P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner states on
instructions that the petitioner is not interested in
pursuing this remedy hence allowed to be withdrawn
with liberty to file fresh petition in case of new
cause of action.
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Vitthal Corporation Ltd.
Union of India
A.M.KHANWILKAR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court