Petitioner withdrew writ petition after Respondent No. 2 undertook to provide an authorised person for a convened Special General Body Meeting. Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 25912
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
vgm ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 259 OF 2012
Modern Usha Colony Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ...Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Jahangir Khan for the Petitioner
Mr. B.B. Sharma, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3
Mr. G.W. Mattos, A.G.P., for Respondent No. 2
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND N.M. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE: MARCH 1, 2012
P.C .:-
Mr. Mattos, A.G.P., for respondent No. 2, on instructions, states that respondent No. 2 has been informed that the Special General Body Meeting of the petitioner-Society has been convened on 25th March, 2012. In that view of the matter, respondent No. 2 will make necessary arrangement to keep the authorised person present at the time and place when the said meeting will be held by the petitioner.
2 25912
The name of the authorised person will be communicated to the petitioner-Society on or before 6th March, 2012.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Modern Usha Colony Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
