Ankush Manik Pol v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ladda
wp-662-12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 662 OF 2012.
Ankush Manik Pol
..Petitioner.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents.
Ms Farhan Qureshi i/by Murtuza Nazmi Amicus Curiae. Mrs S.D.Shinde, A.P.P.for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
Dated :- 14th August, 2012.
P.C. :-
the petitioner has already been granted furlough leave. In that sense nothing survived for consideration in this letter-petition. However, we wanted to reassure ourselves that the time taken for deciding the application was on account of unavoidable situation. The learned A.P.P.
1 of 2
wp-662-12.sxw
has handed in chart indicating the manner in which the application made by the petitioner was processed by the concerned authorities. It is noticed that the time was consumed mainly in getting police report. The concerned police officials kept on visiting the address of surety to verify the presence of surety on the said address but it was noticed that the premises were found locked. We have noticed that the police officials had visited the same address on several occasions and eventually decided to forward the adverse police report. In the circumstances, nothing more requires to be done in this writ petition. The writ petition be treated as disposed of.
(A.R.JOSHI,J)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
2 of 2
Ankush Manik Pol
The State of Maharashtra and others
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court