This order allowed the withdrawal of the criminal writ petition on instructions from counsel, with no substantive decision recorded.
Pending withdrawal allowed on instructions of counsel to adopt appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 WP606/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.606 OF 2012
Mr Vasant Ravji Shah v/s
...Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents
Mr U. Warunjikar for Petitioner. Mr A.S. Shitole, APP for State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER 2012.
P.C. :-
counsel for petitioner is allowed to withdraw the
writ petition to adopt appropriate proceedings. Time spent in between shall be considered, if application for excusing the delay is made.
Mr Vasant Ravji Shah
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
