A miscellaneous matter moved for speaking notes. The bench noted that the petitioners' arguments amounted to a review of a judgment, advising them to seek appropriate remedy. A procedural defect regarding counsel's appearance was also noted.
Noted arguments as review; advised appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp602.91
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
WRIT PETITION NO.602 OF 1991
LAXMANRAO MANOHARRAO DABIR & OTHERS. VERSUS SHIVRAM DHONDIBA & OTHERS.
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri M.D.Joshi.
Advocate for Respondents : Shri C.V. Thombre.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: July 25, 2012
This matter is moved for speaking to minutes. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, it is the contention of the Counsel for the petitioners that the observations in the judgment that, 'However, it will be open for the parties to agitate before the competent Authority about the extent of area of the suit land in which the father of the Petitioners i.e. Manoharrao, was in actual possession and cultivation of the suit land from 1950 to
wp602.91
2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
1968', are not necessary.
2 The matter is moved for speaking to minutes. The arguments advanced will amount to reviewing the judgment and order dated 2nd July, 2012. Therefore, if the petitioners want modification of the said judgment and order, they can resort to appropriate remedy.
3 Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel submits that his appearance is shown for Respondent No.3. However, he appeared for respondents No.1 and 2 only.
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
PLK/*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to include a note in the minutes regarding the extent of land possession.
Whether the petitioners' contention amounts to a review of a judgment.
Laxmanrao Manoharrao Dabir & Others
Shivraram Dhondiba & Others
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
