The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an individual whose name was not specified in the text, for lack of prosecution, discharging the rule and making no order as to costs.
Rule discharged with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp582997
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5829 OF 1997
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
..... CORAM : A.S.OKA & A. V. POTDAR JJ. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2012.
P.C.:
None appears for the Petitioner. The learned AGP appears for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Office noting shows that the Court service notice has been duly served to the Petitioner.
(A. V. POTDAR, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
A.S. OKA
A.V. POTDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
