The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for the final hearing despite two reminders. Rule discharged with no order as to costs.
Rule discharged with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp210497
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2104 OF 1997
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioners. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & A. V. POTDAR JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 30, 2012.
P.C.:
None appeared for the Petitioners though the Petition was called out for final hearing on two occasions during the course of the day. The learned AGP appears for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
(A. V. POTDAR, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Petitioner(s)
Respondent Nos.1 to 3
A.S. OKA
A. V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
