In W.P. No.5520 of 2012, the single-judge bench of the High Court at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the Petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5520.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5520 OF 2012
(Deepak Ramrao Gaikwad & anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.)
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.Y.M. Khan Advocate for Petitioners.
Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Resp. No.1.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2012.
1. The learned counsel appearing for
Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the Petition. Leave granted.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[A.B. CHAUDHARI,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/OCT12
Deepak Ramrao Gaikwad
State of Maharashtra
N.H. Patil
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court