The High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that a writ petition challenging a tender process for an expired period had become infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5214.10
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5214 OF 2010
Samarth Co-operative Consumers Central Stores Ltd. & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Madhav Jamdar for Petitioners.
Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr.S.J.Rairkar for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 14, 2012.
P.C.
which has already expired. In the circumstances, this Petition has become infructuous.
the parties open, to be considered in appropriate proceedings, if and when
occasion arises
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Samarth Co-operative Consumers Central Stores Ltd. & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
