Petitioner sought to challenge caste claim invalidation. Since the High Court found the caste scrutiny committee had invalidated the claim, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
WP5207-10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 5207 OF 2010
Deepak Pradip Solanke
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
***
Mr. A. G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1
and 3.
Mr. U. S. Malte, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr. S. P. Brahme, Advocate for Respondent No.
4.
***
CORAM:NARESH H. PATIL &
S. B. DESHMUKH,JJ.
DATED: 9th MAY, 2012.
PER COURT:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner
submits that the petitioner's caste claim has
been invalidated by the caste scrutiny
committee. Therefore, the petition has become
infructuous.
2. Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
[S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL J.]
Dt.09/05/2012
ans/WP5207-10
Deepak Pradip Solanke
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
S. B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court