The Bombay High Court did not adjudicate merits of the suspension petition but directed departmental enquiry within three months, upheld petitioner's cooperation, kept issues open, and disposed writ petition..
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5056 OF 2012
SHIVAJI MALHARI WARKAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Sunil M.Vibhute AGP for Respondent 1 : Shri D.R.Kale Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri N.S.Kadam
... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S. B. DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: August 02, 2012
PER COURT :-
( S. B. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J. )
akl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should grant relief in pending departmental suspension proceedings.
SHIVAJI MALHARI WARKAD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
NARESH H. PATIL
S. B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
