The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition seeking relief regarding an unimplemented demolition order and a pending representation to the Council Chief Officer.
Liberty granted to petitioner to approach the Chief Officer for expediting the pending representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-4993-12
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4993 OF 2012
Mohanbhai Mangalbhai Patel ..Petitioner
versus
The Administrator, Secretariat Office, Daman & Ors.
..Respondents
Ms. Leena Patil i/b. Mr. M. S. Karnik for Petitioner. Mr. B. D. Joshi for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
13 August 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5.
Silvassa Municipal Council, has passed an order dated 9.2.2009 whereby directed to demolish the building mentioned in the said order. It is contended that since the order was not implemented, the petitioner has
1/2
WP-4993-12
skc
submitted representation dated 3.5.2012 to the Chief Officer, in this regard, which is pending.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for expediting a pending representation regarding demolition of a building.
Mohanbhai Mangalbhai Patel
The Administrator, Secretariat Office, Daman
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
