Two writ petitions were dismissed referencing a prior comprehensive judgment covering the identical issues, as per the learned counsel's statement to the court.
Petitions dismissed on identical terms as Writ Petition No. 3574 of 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3659.12gp.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3659 OF 2012
Mr. Bapuso Shantinath Mithari ......Petitioner. Vs. Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. ......Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3661 OF 2012
Mr. Bupal Nana Khichade ......Petitioner. Vs. Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. ......Respondents.
Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/by Mr. M.S. Topkar for the Petitioner. Mr. D.J. Bhange with Mr. Mayur Joglekar for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 17 SEPTEMBER 2012.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for both the parties, make statement that the issues involved in these petitions are covered by the Judgment dated 25 July 2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 3574 of 2012 and other 63 matters.
dismissed, in the same terms and conditions.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Bapuso Shantinath Mithari
Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd.
Bupal Nana Khichade
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
