Allowed
Ms. Chandbibi Usmangani Khalifa v. the Secretary, Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha and Ors.
Bombay HCRPW/90/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpw90.12.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 90 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3831 OF 2000
Chandbibi Usmangani Khalifa ......Petitioner. Vs.
The Secretary,
Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. ......Respondents.
Mr. A.V. Chatuphale for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.D. Dalvi i/by Mr. G.H. Keluskar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 and 7.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 17 SEPTEMBER 2012.
P.C.:
Admittedly, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner was
absent when the impugned Judgment dated 15 June 2012, was passed in Writ Petition No. 3831 of 2000. Therefore, in the interest of justice,
to give an opportunity to the Petitioner, I am inclined to revoke the impugned Judgment.
clause (a). The matter be placed on board for hearing again, before the Regular Bench.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Chandbibi Usmangani Khalifa
The Secretary, Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court