In Writ Petition No. 3601 of 2012, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous. After the suspension order was challenged, the employer conducted a departmental enquiry and issued a reversion order, rendering the suspension order challenge redundant.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 3601 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.3601 of 2012
Ranjit s/o Ramesh Lakhe (Patil). .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. S.G. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
Shri. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE: 3rd AUGUST 2012
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 3601 of 2012
Sd/- Sd/- (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
1 issue framed by the court
whether the pending writ petition for suspension order becomes infructuous upon the petitioner receiving an order of reversion from a concluded departmental enquiry.
Ranjit s/o Ramesh Lakhe (Patil)
The State of Maharashtra
S.B. DESHMUKH
NARESH H PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
