Partly allowed
Shri. Popat Shankar Shingade and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, through Revenue Dept and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/3398/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a writ petition, the High Court found that the land in question was deleted from operation of the acquisition notification as it was not required for industrial development. Consequently, the prayer to set aside proceedings was dismissed, while a direction was issued for the allotment of land via representation.
What did the court decide?
The prayer to set aside acquisition proceedings was dismissed. Respondent no.2 was directed to consider the petitioners' representation for allotment within three months.