The High Court directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's request for land allotment, pass an order within time, and inform him of the decision or reasons for rejection.
Direction to respondent no.3 to allot one of the lands indicated or provide reasons if not available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
aswp-1998-11
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1998 OF 2011
Shri Aaba Yashvant Deshmukh .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Drupad Patil for petitioner.
Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 5.
CORAM: S. A. BOBDE &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
AUGUST 08, 2012.
P.C.
submitted a list of lands which, according to the petitioner, are available for allotment to him.
2
aswp-1998-11
the petitioner's request for the allotment of lands indicated in the rejoinder. After hearing the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall pass an order allotting one of the said lands or give reason if such lands are not available. The order shall be communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent no.3 on 21.8.2012.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (S. A. BOBDE,J.)
Shri Aaba Yashvant Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
S. A. Bobde
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
