Dismissed
Shri Santosh S/O Murlidharrao Mahatme v. Zilla Parishad, through Its Chief Executive Officer, Amravati and 2 Others
Bombay HCWP/3119/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
26.07.wp.3119.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3119 / 2011
(Santosh Murlidhar Mahatme vs.. Zilla Parishad, Amravati and others )
.................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.S.Kilor, Adv.for petitioner
Mr./ J B Kasat, Adv. For respondent no.1.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 26th July, 2012.
Mr. A.S.Kilor, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that on account of passage of time, the reliefs which the petitioner has sought for in this petition, have been rendered infructuous.
Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Santosh Murlidhar Mahatme
Zilla Parishad, Amravati
P.V. Hardas
M.L. Tahiyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court