The petitioner sought a writ regarding his appointment. The court found the petition became infructuous because the department had already granted approval for his appointment, thus disposing of the matter without merit analysis.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; rule discharged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
91wp2973.95.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 2973 of 1995 (Rahim Karnuji Meshram .vs. The Edu. Officer, Z.P., Bhandara and Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr.D.P.Thakare, A.G.P. for Resp.Nos.1 to 4.
Coram : P. B. Majmudar and
A. P. Bhangale, JJ.
Date : 09/01/2012.
Mr.D.I.Jain, Adv. holding for Mr.Anil Mardikar, Adv. for the petitioner states that, during pendency of the present petition, approval to the appointment of the petitioner is already granted by the department for the period 1993-94 and for subsequent periods.
In view of the above statement made by the learned Counsel, this petition has become infructuous. Hence, the petition is disposed of as 'infructuous'. Rule is discharged. No costs.
J UDGE J UDGE
jais
Rahim Karnuji Meshram
The Edu. Officer, Z.P., Bhandara
P. B. Majmudar
A. P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
