This single-line order disposed of the writ petition regarding a pending pension case. The court directed Respondent No. 3 to decide the pension matter within two months without issuing a further notice.
Direction to decide pension case within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0108wp2748.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2748 OF 2012
Madhukar Nagorao Mendhe Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Shri N. A. Gaikwad Adv for petitioner. Shri D. P. Thakre AGP for respondents/State.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M . T. JOSHI JJ.
DATED: 1st AUGUST, 2012.
In this Writ Petition it is not necessary to issue notice to the
respondent no. 2 because relief is sought essentially against the respondents no. 1 and 3. The pension case of the petitioner is pending before respondent no.3. We direct him to decide the same as expeditiously as possible and within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Writ Petition is disposed of in these terms, with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
svk
Madhukar Nagorao Mendhe
State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
