In a writ petition, the Court directed a respondent authority to examine a petitioner's representation within four weeks and decide expeditiously if the grievance is valid.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to examine the petitioner's representation within four weeks and decide expeditiously if the grievance is correct.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
119911
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
vgm
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1199 OF 2011
Sanjay Suryakant Vaidya ...Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. R.S. Alange for the Petitioner
Ms. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
N.M. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 29, 2012
P.C .:-
Considering the grievance made in this petition, we deem it
appropriate to dispose of this petition, with direction to respondent No. 2 to examine the representation made by the petitioner dated 19th June, 2010 within four weeks from today, and, if the grievance is found to be correct, shall take the decision taken on the representation to its logical end in accordance with law expeditiously.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Sanjay Suryakant Vaidya
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
A.M. Khanwilkar
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
