The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek redressal. The Court disposed of the petition granting the liberty as prayed.
Petition disposed with liberty to petitioner to make representation to Respondent No. 2 for redressal within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26.wpl.1938.12.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1938 OF 2012
M/s. Sai Chayya Flour Mill
..Petitioner
Vs.
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Prashant D. Jadhav for petitioner
Ms. Kiran Bagalia i/b Ms. Chitra Phadke for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : OCTOBER 29, 2012.
P.C.:
the present Writ Petition with liberty to make a representation to respondent no. 2 for redressal of its grievance made in the petition within a period of two weeks from today. The learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 states that respondent no. 2 shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the
Pg 1 of 2
26.wpl.1938.12.doc
representation.
for the respondent no. 2, we dispose of the present petition accordingly with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ D.D.SINHA, J. ]
kandarkar
M/s. Sai Chayya Flour Mill
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
D.D.Sinha
SMT. V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
