The High Court dismissed the petition for transfer to an open prison, upholding the Appropriate Authority's decision because the petitioner faced a pending criminal case resulting in disqualification under the Rules.
Petitioner's request for transfer to open prison was rejected; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JVS
WP.2530.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2012
Kamalakar Abdullya Pawar : Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent
Through Jail.
Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.G.KETKAR,JJ.
DATED:1st August, 2012
P.C.:
Considering the fact that criminal case is pending
against the Petitioner, he has incurred disqualification in terms of Rule 4(ii)(d) of the Rules.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's request for transfer to open prison should be allowed despite disqualification under Rule 4(ii)(d).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamalakar Abdullya Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court