Conditional order granted petitioner additional time to amend writ petition; failure to amend could result in dismissal. Matter listed for future hearing.
Petitioner given further time to amend petition with copy to Public Prosecutor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.2437.2012.doc
JVS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2437 OF 2012
Vinayak Rajaram Bhagat :- Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. :- Respondents
Mr. Debajyoti Talukdar, for the Petitioner. Ms. P. H. Kantharia, APP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:-A.M.KHANWILKAR &
A.R.JOSHI,JJ.
DATED:-10th AUGUST, 2012
P.C.:-
Office has wrongly placed this matter under caption
“direction”. The Petition is disposed of in terms of self operating conditional order dated 23rd July, 2012.
J.V.Salunke,PA
WP.2437.2012.doc
JVS
time, failing which, the Petition be treated as dismissed, for non prosecution, without further reference to the Court.
(A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
Vinayak Rajaram Bhagat
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
A.M.Khanwilkar
A.R.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court